User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.1Mac OS X 10.6Gecko 2.0.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.1closeOS X 10.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko Mac 10.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.1closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.1closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.1closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.1Gecko 20110608Mac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko 2.0.1Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:45 | by ThaDafinser