User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10A403 Safari/6533.18.5 DiigoBrowser
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-673.php
Diigo Browser 0.0iOS 6.0unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Diigo Browser WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6533.18.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 6.0AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.0closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 536.26iOS 6.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 536.26iOS 6.0AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:44 | by ThaDafinser