User agent detail

Groupon/2.10.3156 (Android 4.2.2; Samsung Jflte / Samsung GT-I9505; Telekom.de)[preload=true;locale=de_DE;clientidbase=android-samsung]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungJflte Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Groupon 2.10.3156closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungJfltemobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY S4smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungJfltecloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Groupon 2.10 Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy S4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.12601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:43 | by ThaDafinser