User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36 Kinza/1.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-386.php
Kinza 1.2Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Kinza 1.2Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:43 | by ThaDafinser