User agent detail

MOT-V26X_/00.62 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV26X_ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V26X closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2close MotorolaV260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaV26Xsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close MotorolaV26X_closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.2.3.2 MotorolaMotorola V26Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaV26Xmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV260Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:42 | by ThaDafinser