User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1) Gecko/20100208 MozillaDeveloperPreview/3.7a1 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.06001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.3closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
MozillaDeveloperPreview 3.7.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.3a1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.3a1Gecko 20100208Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.3a1Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:42 | by ThaDafinser