User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091016 Firefox/3.5.4 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-114.php
Firefox 3.5WinXP 5.11.9.1 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.4closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.4closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.4closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.4closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.4Gecko 20091016Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.4Gecko 1.9.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.05201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:42 | by ThaDafinser