User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; SAMURAI10(QuadCore) Build/SAMURAI10) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.138 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.0unknown ShiruSamurai 10Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.0ShiruSamurai 10Tabletyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.0SamsungU8950-1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.0.4SAMURAI10(QuadCore)closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.138WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.0.4SAMURAI10(QuadCore)tabletyescloseclose0.11901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:41 | by ThaDafinser