User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; P93G Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.122 YaBrowser/14.12.2125.9740.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 14.12Android 4.4unknown PiPOP9 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.12Blink Android 4.4PiPOP9 3GTabletyesyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.12.2125.9740.01closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.291 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.12Blink Android 4.4yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.12.2125.9740.01closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.12.2125closeAndroid 4.4.2P93Gcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.12.2125.9740.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.12Blink Android 4.4.2P93Gtabletyescloseclose0.08401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4PiPOP9 3GTabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:41 | by ThaDafinser