User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; ru) Presto/2.6.7 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Opera 11.00Windows 7Presto 2.6.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0Presto 2.6.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.00Presto 2.6.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:41 | by ThaDafinser