User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.20 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1031.0 Safari/535.20 SUSE/19.0.1031.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chrome Dev 19.0.1031.0SUSE Webkit 535.20desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 19.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 19.0WebKit SUSE 19.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 19.0.1031closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 19.0.1031.0WebKit 535.20Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 19.0.1031.0Webkit 535.20SUSE desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:40 | by ThaDafinser