User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us; iris356 Build/irisIRIS356) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2WebKit LavaIris 356smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 356mobile-browseryescloseclose0.247 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LavaIris 356smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 356closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 356closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.229 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.458 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2LavaIris 356mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2LavaIris 356Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:40 | by ThaDafinser