User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 3.1Gecko 1.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 3.1.10closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 3.1 Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ThunderBrowse 3.3.5closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 3.1.10closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.17Gecko 20110414Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.457 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 3.1.10Gecko 1.9.2Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:40 | by ThaDafinser