User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; Edition Next; xx) Presto/2.11.310 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 12.50Windows XPPresto 2.11.310desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.50Presto Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.11.310Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.50Presto 2.11.310Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:39 | by ThaDafinser