User agent detail

Mozilla/4.76 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; U; Windows 95; PalmSource; PalmOS; WebPro; Tungsten Proxyless 1.1 320x320x16)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Palm WebPro palmOS PalmTungstensmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closePalm OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.231 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Palm WebPro palmOS PalmTungstensmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebPro Palm OS pdacloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close PalmTungsten CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:39 | by ThaDafinser