User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-I607/I607FG1 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; Smartphone; 320x240)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 4.0.1Windows Mobile Samsungi607 BlackJackmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 4.01Trident 3.1WinCE SamsungSGH-I607Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.01Trident Windows CE SamsungSGH-I607smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.1closeWindows CE SamsungSGH-I607closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 4.1Trident Windows Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 4.0.1 Windows Mobile Samsungi607 BlackJackmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SamsungSGH-i607Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:39 | by ThaDafinser