User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.2; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; WOW64)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-084.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.17102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:39 | by ThaDafinser