User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (CrKey armv7l 1.8.17977) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 31 Blink 537.36GoogleChromecasttelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink GoogleChromecasttv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650close closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.0WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink GoogleChromecasttelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:38 | by ThaDafinser