User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-TW; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090308 Shiretoko/3.1b4pre (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox Shiretoko (3.1)Windows XPGecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.1b4precloseWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Shiretoko (3.1)Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Shiretoko 3.1b4precloseWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.1.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Shiretoko 3.1b4precloseWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Shiretoko 3.1b4preGecko 20090308Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Shiretoko 3.1b4Gecko 1.9.1b4Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:38 | by ThaDafinser