User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Vivaldi/1.0.83.38 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-547.php
Vivaldi 1.0MacOSX 10.10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Vivaldi 1.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeOS X 10.10.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Vivaldi 1.0.83closeMac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Vivaldi 1.0Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:38 | by ThaDafinser