User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.0.1; en-gb; VegaComb Build/HRI66) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AdventVegaComb Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.12401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.0.1GenericAndroid 3.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.0tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.0.1closeAndroid 3.0.1AdventVegaCombcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.13Android 3.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.0.1VegaCombtabletyescloseclose0.08001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 3.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:38 | by ThaDafinser