User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061007 Minefield/3.0a1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox Minefield (3.0)Windows Server 2003Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Minefield) 3.0a1closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Minefield (3.0)Gecko Windows Server 2003desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9acloseWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Minefield) 3.0.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Minefield 3.0a1closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.097 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Minefield 3.0a1Gecko 20061007Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Minefield 3.0a1Gecko 1.9a1Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:37 | by ThaDafinser