User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; BOLT/2.101) AppleWebKit/530 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 4.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Bolt 2.101closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.0WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BOLT 2.101closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Bolt 2.101closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 4.0WebKit 530Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 4.0Webkit 530Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeWindows XPBolt BrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:36 | by ThaDafinser