User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; de-de; ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 985 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOne Touch 985 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6AlcatelOT-985mobile-browseryescloseclose0.245 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3AlcatelOne Touch 985smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6AlcatelOne Touch 985closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6AlcatelOne Touch 985mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3AlcatelOT-985Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:35 | by ThaDafinser