User agent detail

Motorola-E365 UP.Browser/6.1.0.7 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaE365 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 MotorolaE365Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Motorola-E365 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.7close MotorolaE365mobile-browseryescloseclose0.272 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 MotorolaE365smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.1.0close MotorolaE365closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.7 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.1 MotorolaE365mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaE365Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:34 | by ThaDafinser