User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (N04A;FOMA;like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-docomo.yaml
NECN04Amobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close NECN04Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.176 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoN04Acloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.233 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NECN04Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N04Acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoN-01AFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:34 | by ThaDafinser