User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux;U;Android 4.4.2;zh-cn;Lenovo A3300-HV Build/KOT49H) AppleWebkit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/537.306;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-544.php
Android WebView 4.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoTAB A7-30 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoTAB A7-30 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 537.306closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 537.306Blink Android 4.4LenovoA3300-HVsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 537.306;closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 537.306closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA3300-HVcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 537.306WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 537.306Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoIdeaTab A3300tabletyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 53closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA3300Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:34 | by ThaDafinser