User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; ETON T860) Linux/3.0.8-svn5727 Release/10.31.2013 AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.0.3WebKit EtonT860smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0EtonT860smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:34 | by ThaDafinser