User agent detail

NaverWebToon/1.4.4(Android OS 4.0.4;samsung YP-GP1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungYP-GP1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.05501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NaverWebToon 1.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid media-playercloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungGalaxy Player 5.8portable media playeryes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungYP-GP1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy Player 5.8mediayescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.04501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:33 | by ThaDafinser