User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Opera 12.12Windows 8Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.177 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.12Presto Windows 8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.12closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.12closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12.388Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12.388Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:33 | by ThaDafinser