User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9) AppleWebKit/537.71 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Safari/537.71 (Rival IQ, rivaliq.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-862.php
Rival IQ yesRival IQ BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesRival IQ BotBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 7.0WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Rival IQ closeMac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 7.0WebKit 537.71Mac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 7.0Webkit 537.71OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:33 | by ThaDafinser