User agent detail

Nokia6120c/3.83; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Nokia Browser 0.0SymbianOS unknownunknown Nokia6120 ClassicMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser SymbianOS Nokia6120 ClassicMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia6120c 3.83closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 Nokia6120 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia6120csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 3.83;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6120ccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6120ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.437 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 Nokia6120 classicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6120 classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:33 | by ThaDafinser