User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; Opera Mini/5.1.21594/35.2989; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
Opera Mini 5.1Windows Mobile Presto 2.8.119mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Deviceyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21594closeWindows LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Windows Mobile yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.21594close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.21594closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21594closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.273 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21594Presto 2.8.119Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:33 | by ThaDafinser