User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0 Fennec/10.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 10.0Maemo Gecko 10.0mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 10.0Gecko 10.0Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 10.0closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 10.0Gecko Maemo yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 10.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 10.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 10.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 10.0Gecko 20100101Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 10.0Gecko 10.0Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser