User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; ru; M785) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/10.0.0.556 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.0Android 4.2unknown AOSONM785Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.0U2 Android 4.2AOSONM785Tabletyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxBolt A068mobile-browseryescloseclose0.3 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.0 Android 4.2MecerXpress Smartlife M785tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.0.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.131 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.0.0.556 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.445 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.0Gecko Android 4.2.2M785mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser