User agent detail

PANTECH-C180/R01 Browser/Obigo/Q03c
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechC180 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PANTECH-C180 R01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3cclose PantechC180mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03c PantechC180smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close PantechC180closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q03c Browser Q03c closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3 PantechC180mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q03close PantechC180Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser