User agent detail

Mozilla/1.1N (X11; I; BSD/OS 2.0 i386)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.1BSD/OS 2.0 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1closeBSD/OS 2.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.242 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.1Nclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1N a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 1.1 BSD/OS 2.0desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser