User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv7l; xx; rv:1.9.2b6pre) Gecko/20100318 Firefox/3.5 Maemo Browser 1.7.4.8 RX-51 N900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
MicroB 1.7.4Maemo Gecko 1.9.2b6NokiaN900mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maemo 1.7 Linux Mobile Phoneyes0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 1.7Gecko Maemo NokiaN900tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maemo Browser 1.7.4closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maemo Browser 1.7.4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5Gecko 20100318Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.498 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MicroB 1.7.4Gecko 1.9.2b6Maemo NokiaN900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5closeLinux armv7l NokiaN900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser