User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 UBrowser/3.1.1644.34 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 3.1Windows 8Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.13901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows 8desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.1Blink Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:32 | by ThaDafinser