User agent detail

WebKit/3.7.6, (CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/3.3.0 NewB) PHILIPS-AVM-2013/2.19 (Philips, BDP5600, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Webkit 3.7.6PhilipsBlu-ray Player (BDP5600)tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WebKit 3.7.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
PhilipsBlu-ray Player (BDP5600)tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 3.7.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 3.7.6 PhilipsBDP5600 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:31 | by ThaDafinser