User agent detail

iTunes/10.2.1 (Windows; Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)) AppleWebKit/533.20.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/mediaplayer.yml
iTunes 10.2.1Windows 7 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iTunes WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.20.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
iTunes 10.2.1closeWindows 7media-playercloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iTunes 10.2 Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iTunes 10.2.1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
iTunes 10.2.1closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iTunes 10.2.1WebKit 533.20.25Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.548 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iTunes 10.2.1Webkit 533.20.25Windows desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:31 | by ThaDafinser