User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.7-Jeremy; zh-CN; Lenovo A668t Build/GWK74) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.4.329 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA668t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.4.329closeAndroid 2.3.7-JeremyGenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.252 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA668tsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.7closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.4closeAndroid 2.3.7LenovoA668tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.7-Jeremyclosecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.4.329WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.7LenovoA668mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:31 | by ThaDafinser