User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux 2.6.8.1; X11; i686; en_US) (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux 2.6.8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.2KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.2KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.2;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.2closeLinux 2.6.8closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.224 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.2 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.2 Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:31 | by ThaDafinser