User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C3312R Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/7.0.32562/34.1853; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-C3312R Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.0Presto 2.2JAVA SamsungGT-C3312RMobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.0.32562closeJVM SamsungGT-C3312Rmobile-browseryescloseclose0.242 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.0Presto SamsungGT-C3312Rsmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.0.32562close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.0.32562close SamsungGT-C3312Rcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.0.32562close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.0.32562Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.0Presto 2.8.119Touchwiz SamsungRex 60mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:30 | by ThaDafinser