User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.15 (KHTML, like Gecko; +http://www.diffbot.com) Chrome/24.0.1295.0 Safari/537.15
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesDiffbotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesDiffbotBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesdiffbotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0WebKit 537.15Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:30 | by ThaDafinser