User agent detail

DiigoBrowser Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 5_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-673.php
Diigo Browser 0.0iOS 5.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Diigo Browser WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.0WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 5.0closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.2closeiPhone OS 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.098 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2WebKit 533.17.9iOS 5.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 533.17.9iOS 5.0AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:30 | by ThaDafinser