User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; CUBOT X6 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111Android 4.2.2Blink CUBOTX6smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.2.2CubotX6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.2CUBOTX6smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2CubotX6closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.111WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.553 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2CubotX6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.08401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:30 | by ThaDafinser