User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.117 Safari/537.36 Nichrome/self/33
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-315.php
Nichrome 33.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nichrome 33.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome selfcloseWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.122 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:30 | by ThaDafinser