User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/19.0 SeaMonkey/2.16a1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.16a1Mac OS X 10.6Gecko 19.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.16Gecko MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeOS X 10.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.25 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.16Gecko Mac 10.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.16.0closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.16a1Gecko 19.0Mac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.16a1Gecko 19.0Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:29 | by ThaDafinser