User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ220i/R5C TelecaBrowser/4.08
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ220i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 4.0 JAVA SonyEricssonJ220iMobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ220i R5Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 4.08close Sony EricssonJ220imobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonJ220ifeature phoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonJ220icloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J220icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 4.08 Sony EricssonJ220imobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ220iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:29 | by ThaDafinser